As part of our Football Moves People campaign, our friends at family history website Findmypast have been exploring the pasts of England, Scotland’s and Wales’s footballing heroes to see where their heritage lies.
Trent Alexander-Arnold was part of England’s initial 26-man Euros squad, but suffered an injury in a warm-up game which forced him to withdraw from the tournament. In this post, Findmypast’s family history experts delve into the Liverpool-born player’s family tree and try to assess some of the headline-grabbing claims about his family ties to the US – and to Sir Alex Ferguson.
Trent Alexander-Arnold was born in 1998 in Liverpool. As is the case with most professional footballers, a quick web search will reveal a few facts about their backgrounds and, perhaps, a few not so factual stories.
With Trent, the two pieces of information you come across repeatedly on the internet are that his maternal uncle is John Alexander, a retired football administrator; and that John himself is a friend of the football manager Sir Alex Ferguson who, coincidentally, apparently had a girlfriend, Doreen, in the late 1950s who went on to become Trent’s maternal grandmother. Here at family history website Findmypast, we have tried to reconstruct Trent Alexander-Arnold’s family tree to see what we could uncover.
Trent Alexander-Arnold’s parents are Michael Arnold and Dianne Alexander. His father Michael is a businessman who once traded in commodities but now manages Trent’s business affairs. It appears he was born in 1961 in Liverpool.
Findmypast believes that Trent’s mother Dianne was born in 1966, although there was no obvious birth record for her in the publicly available birth indexes for England.
Another thing you read about Trent online is that, according to FIFA rules, he was eligible to play for the United States national team. This means that one of his parents or grandparents must have been born in the US. So perhaps Dianne was born in the USA. This is in keeping with Sir Alex Ferguson’s autobiography, in which he writes that his first serious girlfriend Doreen Carling, who he dated in the late 1950s in the Glasgow suburb of Cardonald, emigrated to New York and married there. If so, this suggests that Doreen must have married a Mr Alexander in NYC in, say, the early 1960s and Trent’s mother Dianne was her daughter and was born there. In family history terms, these are modern-era events, making supporting evidence tricky to come by in online sources.
Next, Findmypast tried a different approach. If John Alexander is the maternal uncle of Trent Alexander-Arnold, that would mean that he is a brother of Trent’s mother Dianne. Findmypast’s research indicates that John was born in 1955 in Liverpool, the first child of parents Eric Edward Alexander and Moira Alexander née Kelly – and they were born in 1932 and 1935 respectively in Liverpool. If Findmypast is right, this means that John Alexander cannot be a maternal uncle to Trent – perhaps he is a great uncle instead? If he were a great uncle, that would mean that he was a brother of Trent’s maternal grandmother the Mr Alexander (forename not known) who, as above, Findmypast surmised may have married Sir Alex Ferguson’s ex-girlfriend in the States. Yet, Findmypast could not trace such a brother. So perhaps the family relationship is even more complex.
What we can say with confidence about Trent Alexander-Arnold’s family history is that he has a diverse background, the result of the movement of people internationally. Like his father, he was born in Liverpool, a port city with a deep-rooted Black history. His paternal grandfather was probably an immigrant ancestor who came from somewhere within the Commonwealth. His mother may have been born in New York. His maternal grandmother may have been born in Scotland to, as Sir Alex Ferguson writes in his autobiography, an Irish Catholic mother, and emigrated to the States.
Whatever his background, Trent delights Liverpool and England football fans with his talent on the pitch. And, like other young men from similar backgrounds who have found success on the pitch, he hasn’t forgotten where he comes from. Trent regularly supports his local charity An Hour for Others and he will undoubtedly continue to contribute to local and national life as his career develops.
More generally, Trent Alexander-Arnold is almost certainly the first person in history to bear his name. Most elite footballers get children named after them, and you can imagine a fervent fan of Liverpool FC with the surname Arnold giving the forenames Trent Alexander to a son in a tribute to their idol.
The origins of double-barrelled surnames
Until the last quarter of the 20th century, double-barrelled compound surnames such as Trent’s were the preserve of the more affluent classes in society. Harry Enfield’s comedy character Miles Cholmondley-Warner was a play on that; you knew what you were going to get immediately upon hearing the name.
The same is true of the real life late Major-General Sir Brian Wyldbore-Smith, or the Conservative politician Jacob Rees-Mogg.
Things have changed, though, and the double-barrelling of names is now an established trend. In the Premier League, we have Ainsley Maitland-Niles, Alexander Oxlade-Chamberlain, Dominic Calvert-Lewin, Ruben Loftus-Cheek and many others alongside Trent Alexander-Arnold.
This naming pattern reflects changes in society and especially in family structure. Early adopters included egalitarian couples who didn’t want their marriage to erode the woman’s original identity and who chose to preserve her surname. Other double-barrelled names have arisen due to the increasing complexity of our modern non-nuclear family relationships with their divorce and remarriage, step families, unmarried couples and so on. Migration plays a role in this too, as individuals from diverse and different family backgrounds want to make sure that their own identities are not lost over time.
Where will your family story take you? From your ancestors’ journeys across oceans to immigrants creating new lives in Britain, Findmypast has everything you need to start discovering the secrets hidden in old family records. It all starts with your family tree.
We’ve teamed up with Findmypast, who will be offering advice on how to research migration-related aspects of your family tree. In the first in a series of guest posts, Findmypast’s family history experts have created a guide to help you discover if you could be related to someone who was transported to Australia as a convict.
Colour lithograph of the First Fleet entering Port Jackson on January 26 1788, drawn in 1888. Creator: E. Le Bihan. Image provided to Wikimedia Commons by the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW)
Hundreds of thousands of convicts were transported from Britain and Ireland to Australia between 1787 and 1868. Today, it’s estimated that 20% of the Australian population are descended from people originally transported as convicts, while around 2 million Britons have transported convict ancestry.
Here are some tips and resources to help you discover whether your family tree includes anyone who was transported as part of this mass forced movement of people.
Why were convicts sent to Australia?
During the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, transportation was a common sentence for people convicted of crimes for which the death penalty was deemed too severe a punishment.
From the early 1600s until 1776, most transported convicts were sent to British colonies in North America. With the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, transportation to North America was halted. With Britain’s prisons becoming increasingly overcrowded and amid growing domestic criticism against widespread use of the death penalty, the British government sought alternative locations to send people convicted of less-severe crimes. Australia was seen as a potential alternative destination. In 1787, the First Fleet set off to establish a new penal colony in New South Wales.
Many people were transported for what we’d consider minor offences today. Petty theft, fraud and violence were all common misdemeanours which could have resulted in a transportation sentence of 7 or 14 years. More serious offences, often tried at London’s Old Bailey, were likely to be met with a transportation life sentence.
Around one in seven convicts transported to Australia were women. They often suffered the toughest time in the Australian colonies.
An 1853 licence granted to Mary Atherton, detailing her conviction and transportation sentence. View the full record at Findmypast.
Start your search in Britain
If convicted in Britain, your ancestor would have appeared in front of their local magistrate to be sentenced. Check court registers and local newspaper reports for details of their crime and sentence to see if the verdict was noted as ‘transportation’ on their record.
An extract from Perthshire Constitutional & Journal, 8 May 1835. View-in-full at Findmypast.
Many criminals who were sentenced to transportation never actually left Britain. Instead, they served their time on prison ships known as hulks – decommissioned Royal Navy vessels docked in rivers and ports across southern England.
Over a third of transported convicts were sent from Ireland, which was still completely under British rule at the time, so you may want to check Ireland’s historical prison and court registers. Significant numbers of convicts were also transported to Bermuda and Gibraltar.
Take your research Down Under
The First Fleet, which included six convict transport ships carrying almost 800 convicts (almost 200 of whom were women), arrived at Botany Bay, Sydney in 1787. In the years that followed, penal colonies were established in Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania), Queensland and Western Australia. There are extensive record collections available on Findmypast to help you trace ancestors who were transported to Australia as convicts. Start by searching:
In terms of colonisers, Victoria and South Australia were inhabited by free settlers only – all six colonies had long-established First Australian populations, civilisations and cultures prior to colonisation by the British. Unlike Australia, New Zealand was not a British colony when mass transportation of convicts began in the 1780s and didn’t have any major penal colonies.
Life of a convict
Most convicts transported to Australia were assigned a trade in their penal colony. Their work was unpaid until their sentence was served.
A Ticket of Leave system offered early release for well-behaved convicts. After serving some of their sentence, they could work for themselves in designated areas under the condition that they reported to the local police regularly. In some cases, conditional and absolute pardons were granted.
Once they’d completed their penal servitude, convicts were issued with a Certificate of Freedom and were free to settle in Australia or return home at their own expense.
If you can’t find a trace of your relatives in convict records, try their marriage and death records instead. Convicts were required to apply for permission to marry from each colony’s Governor (prior to Federation in 1901, Australia was divided into six self-governing British colonies), so look out for notations such as ‘married with the permission of the Governor’ or ‘prisoner of the Crown’.
After several rounds of reform and the introduction of new laws and legislation, the transportation system was finally abolished in 1868.
With an estimated fifth of the Australian population descended from those transported as convicts from the UK, and a further 2 million Britons able to trace their ancestry to this population too, could this story of forced emigration be part of your family history?
Discover more British emigration stories in Departures, a new podcast from the Migration Museum exploring 400 years of emigration from Britain. The podcast accompanies the Migration Museum’s exhibition Departures, which runs until Summer 2021. Find out more and listen here.
Dr Lesley Trotter contributed to our Departures exhibition and features in the latest episode of our Departures podcast, which focuses on the so-called ‘left behind’ wives of Cornwall in the 19th century. The episode page features Henry Scott Tuke’s painting ‘The Message.’ Dr Trotter chose a study for this painting as the cover image for her book ‘The Married Widows of Cornwall’.
In this guest post, Dr Trotter reveals the fascinating real-life story of the woman featured in the painting: Mrs Elizabeth Fouracre.
Henry Scott Tuke – The Message (1890). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. From the Falmouth Art Gallery collection.
I came across Henry Scott Tuke’s painting ‘The Message’ early in my research on the Cornish wives ‘left behind’, and I always thought that the scene of a mother with young children seeming to pause in her daily activities to sit and read a letter that had just arrived must have been a familiar occurrence in the homes of the women I was interested in. The mother’s enigmatic expression gives little clue as to what the letter says – is it good news, or bad? What are the implications for her and her children? For me, this comes across even more in the preparatory study that Tuke produced, which captures his model for the mother with untidy hair and a duller complexion. It was this image that I chose for the cover of The Married Widows of Cornwall.
Tuke’s model in this case was his housekeeper, Mrs Elizabeth Fouracre. Throughout my book I was determined to put women’s stories centre stage, so it didn’t feel right that the identifiable woman on the cover should remain defined simply as Mr Fouracre’s wife and Tuke’s housekeeper. What was her story? Who was Mrs Fouracre?
The girl who was to become Tuke’s housekeeper was Elizabeth Jane Vandersluys born 1857 in Perranzabuloe on the north coast of Cornwall. Her great grandfather was Lambertus Vandersluys, a dancing master of Dutch descent who lived in Lostwithiel. When Lambertus died in 1791 the authorities there did everything they could to have his widow Peggy and her children (including Elizabeth’s grandfather, George, then aged 2) removed to another parish. George eventually settled and raised a family in St Clements near Truro where he was parish clerk for many years. Elizabeth’s father James Richard Vandersluys was the only child of George’s second marriage and was born in 1838, just a year before George died.
In 1857 James Richard Vandersluys, a 19-year-old tin miner, married Elizabeth Inch from Perranzabuloe. Elizabeth Jane, their first child, was born there later that year and was followed by Eliza in 1859, Ellen (1862) and William George (1865).
In 1881 Elizabeth Jane was 23 and employed as a domestic servant in Ferris Town, Truro, but the following year she returned to Perranzabuloe for her marriage to George Fouracre, a railway packer. It might have been George’s work on the railway that brought the couple to Falmouth, we don’t know, but in 1885 they were living in a house that had been built for the manager of the, by then disused, arsenic works on the cliffs between Swanpool and Pennance Point. The Fouracres shared the house, Pennance Cottage, with the Andrews family, and it was Elizabeth and Mrs Andrews that Henry Scott Tuke approached that summer to see if he could rent a couple of rooms in the house overlooking the bay.
The two women soon found themselves modelling for Tuke, and his painting A Morning Gossip pictures them chatting over the garden fence. By this time Elizabeth was a mother and Tuke shows her holding her baby son Richard. Richard (born 1884) and especially his older brother George (born 1883) were to become regular models for Tuke’s work. As a 17-year-old, George’s occupation in the 1901 census is given as ‘artist’s model’.
Henry Scott Tuke – A Morning Gossip (1885). Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. From the Falmouth Art Gallery collection
That Tuke painted Elizabeth and Mrs Andrews literally on opposite sides of the fence in A Morning Gossip may be more than coincidence because it appears there were frequent arguments and disturbances in the house resulting in the dismayed Tuke spending most of his time on his boat. By June 1886 the Andrews had left, and Elizabeth and her family also appear to have moved elsewhere, because Tuke took over the house, installing the Jewell family as housekeepers. However, Mrs Jewell proved bad-tempered and prone to rows, and within months he was delighted to have Elizabeth and her family move back in, writing: “Perhaps the beef in the pie will not be rolled quite so nicely but it will be quite good enough, and besides having home-made bread I shall feel as if I had a home to go to, which I never did when the black Jewell, as Mother calls her, was here.”
Tuke clearly had great respect and affection for Elizabeth Fouracre, who was to become his devoted housekeeper for over 30 years. His references to her suggest a strong personality, and it has been suggested that although they were of a similar age, Elizabeth was a motherly figure to him. When photos were taken to illustrate an interview with Tuke to be published in the Windsor Magazine he insisted that no photo of his home would be complete without her.
Tuke was less fond of Elizabeth’s husband George, and there are hints of a drink problem. In the early hours of 30th August 1903 there was a major row and Tuke ejected him, he hoped, from the house for good. However, the 1911 census shows George back living with Elizabeth at the cottage.
In the 1890s, in addition to The Message, Elizabeth featured in two other Tuke works. In Picking Carnations and a sketch called Lady looking out to sea she is pictured in the garden of Pennance Cottage against a backdrop of the bay. In all of these works Elizabeth has an air of thoughtfulness about her. Did she resent the interruption to her busy household work, or was it a precious opportunity for stillness and reflection? One wonders what she might have been thinking about as she held these poses. The 1911 census provides a possible clue as it reveals that Georgie and Richard were not her only children – she had lost four others: Elizabeth Jane at 8 months old in 1886; Albert John at 9 months in 1888, William John at 5 months in 1889, and another as yet unidentified.
When Elizabeth posed reading the letter in The Message, was she recalling letters she had received from family members abroad, like the wives featured in my book? Because as it turns out Elizabeth was all too familiar with the experience of wives being left behind by emigrating miners. In 1884 her own father, James, set sail for the mines of America accompanied by his two sons-in-law. Their wives: Elizabeth’s mother and her two sisters, Ellen and Eliza, neither of whom had been married for much more than a year, remained in Cornwall. Elizabeth’s sisters were reunited with their husbands, but her father, James Vandersluys, was killed in a mining accident in Michigan in 1887. Tragedy was to strike the family again in 1909 when Elizabeth’s 4-year-old granddaughter Lily (Richard’s child) died from burns after playing with matches.
So while Elizabeth was keeping a much-treasured home for Tuke in Cornwall, baking beef pies and making bread, she was also coping with multiple pregnancies and a series of heartbreaking family losses. Her resilience in the face of what life threw at her make hers a far more fitting image for the cover of my book than I could ever have imagined when I chose the picture.
Elizabeth Jane Fouracre died of cancer on 23 April 1916, aged 58.
Dr Lesley Trotter is a social historian, genealogist and writer with a special interest in combining family history and academic research techniques to reveal the hidden stories of the past. Her PhD in Cornish Studies at the University of Exeter focused on the experiences of wives ‘left behind’ by emigrating Cornish miners in the 19th century, now published as The Married Widows of Cornwall. More information can be found on her website: www.humblehistory.com.
This article is based on original genealogical research, and two key works on Tuke: Maria Tuke Sainsbury’s Henry Scott Tuke: A Memoir (M. Secker, London 1933), and Catherine Wallace’s Catching the Light: The Art of Henry Scott Tuke (Atelier Books, 2008).
A Morning Gossip, The Message and Study for The Message – Mrs Fouracre are part of the Tuke collection at Falmouth Art Gallery.
